CHINA China’s star war programme aimed at Taiwan. Beijing (Asia. News/Agencies) – China has deployed 1. Jian- 1. 0 fighter jets at an air force base about 5. ![]() Taiwan, a local source reports; whilst continuing its silence over test- firing an anti- satellite missile a few days ago. Both events suggest that China’s signal was destined for Taiwan. Despite calls from the international community that Beijing explain itself, the mainland has not yet made any statement about the missile it launched last January 1. US sources, from a base in Xichang (Sichuan) destroying an old Chinese satellite orbiting at an altitude of 8. On Friday, US National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley raised the possibility that Chinese President and Commander in Chief Hu Jintao might not have fully known what their military was doing. This would explain the increasingly embarrassing silence. ![]() Still more and more observers wonder about the real motives behind the test. The US was already aware that China was carrying out research and development in anti- satellite weapons as US Lieutenant General Michael Mapes testified before the US Congress this month. This explains why the reaction by the Bush administration has been mild and limited to expressions of “general concern”. During the Cold War until the early 1. US and the Soviet Union had conducted similar tests and destroyed satellites in space. Beijing has not violated any international treaty. And the US’s main national security satellites are orbiting at thousands of kilometres above the earth. What China’s move can do is strengthen the US space defence programme, which Bush had announced in October of last year. Although the test itself has not caught the US off guard, Beijing’s continued silence might step up US complaints. ![]() Some experts noted that a statement made on January 9 by Huang Qiang, spokesman for China’s Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defence, now take on a new light. This might mean that Beijing is trying to get Washington to agree to negotiations to make space a weapons- free zone as requested by both China and Russia, a proposal so far rejected by the US. Other experts point out that China’s People Liberation Army, which has benefited in the past 1. Taiwan Strait. Recently, Taiwanese President Taiwan Chen Shui- bian reiterated the goal of making a formal declaration of independence before the end of his mandate. China has expressed its displeasure with regard to joint military exercises near the island by the US and Japan. It is within the context that Chinese media reported the deployment of 1. What is the story of the Eugenics War in Star Trek. What would a story in which Star Wars and Star Trek universes.Jian- 1. 0 fighter jets to Zhejiang province, some 5. Rear Admiral Wu Chi- fang, spokesman for Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defence, did not confirm these reports. However, he did say that the Taiwanese “military is studying why the Chinese military has . Such studies also included extensive analysis of how satellite surveillance could be used by the US in case of a crisis over Taiwan.
Strategic Defense Initiative. Strategic Defense Initiative logo. SDI is envisioned as a wide- ranging missile defense system that, if it works, will protect the United States from nuclear attacks from the Soviet Union or other countries with ballistic missiles, essentially rendering nuclear weapons, in Reagan’s words, “impotent and obsolete.” Reagan says, “I call upon the scientific community in our country, those who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.” Soviet leader Yuri Andropov’s response is unprececented in its anger (see March 2. Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrinyn says SDI will “open a new phase in the arms race.” . ![]() US 'Star Wars' lasers bring down ballistic missile. The US this week achieved a goal that has eluded it since Ronald Reagan's Star Wars programme by. China’s star war programme aimed at Taiwan North Asia. For United States such sales are “essential” for peace and. China’s state-funded space program is worth $ 11 billion, well behind US’s $40 billion investment but the lower labour costs in. President Reagan Announces . 1983: President Reagan Announces . AUSTRALIA: COALITION FUNDING STAR WARS. The First Order is attacking! But when you got the Star Wars Battle Action Millenium Falcon, you've got. Peter Scoblic’s characterization, “ecstatic, seeing SDI as the ultimate refutation of . In short, SDI was a better adjunct to a first strike than it was a standalone defense. That made it critically destabilizing, which is why missile defense had been outlawed by . Such is the real significance, the seamy side, so to say, of Washington’s . If candor is a sign of sincerity, then Moscow was worried.” . The US wants to discuss a transition from mutual nuclear deterrence based solely on the threat of nuclear retaliation (the concept of MAD, or Mutual Assured Destruction) to increased reliance on ground- and space- based defense systems such as its Strategic Defense Initiative (see March 2. In its turn, the USSR wants a comprehensive ban on research, development, testing, and deployment of “space- strike arms.” . Mc. Farlane proposes that space- based and mobile systems and components based on “other physical principles,” i. The system, still in its research and development stages, will no longer attempt to protect the majority of the US population from nuclear assault. Now, Bush says, SDI will be retooled to “provid. The “Smart Rocks” concept was one component of the original SDI concept, but was retooled, upgraded, and renamed “Brilliant Pebbles” to be the main component of the program. It will never be deployed, and will be defunded entirely during the first year of the Clinton administration. Conservative commentators and former participants have called for a second “Team B”- style competitive intelligence analysis ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall (see 1. The “Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States” (see July 1. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, is packed with conservative and neoconservative hardliners much as the original Team B cadre was; it includes some former Team B members such as former Pentagon official Paul Wolfowitz. Like the original Team B, the Rumsfeld Commission challenges CIA estimates of foreign military threats; like the original Team B, the Rumsfeld Commission wildly overestimates the impending threat from countries such as Iran and North Korea, both of which it judges will be capable of striking the US with nuclear weapons in five years or perhaps less. The original Team B findings impelled thirty years of full- bore military spending by the US to counter a Soviet threat that was fading, not growing; the Rumsfeld Commission’s equally alarmist findings impels a new push for spending on the so- called “Star Wars” ballistic missile defense system (see March 2. Conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly will observe that the Rumsfeld Commission’s report “provided Congress with enough talking points to win the argument . Mitchell will write that the second “Team B” exercise shows “that by 1. Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz had honed the art of intelligence manipulation through use of competitive intelligence analysis. Retrospective assessments revealing serious flaws in the Team B work products came long after political officials had already converted the alarmist reports into political support for favored military policies.” . This is the first time in 8. Senate has refused to ratify a security- related treaty. Helms and other Senate Republicans do not wish to give up the US’s ability to test nuclear weapons if desired, nor do they want to impede the continued development of the “Star Wars” / “Brilliant Pebbles” missile defense system (see March 2. January 2. 9, 1. 99. The world is virtually unipolar today and they would like to keep it that way.” But, the Times goes on to observe: “The irony is that President Bill Clinton wants the CTBT for precisely the same reason. For all his administration’s propaganda about disarmament, the CTBT is intended to lock in to place the technological lead the US has over other nuclear weapon states in terms of weapon designs and delivery systems.” .
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |